Federal Report Will Decide if Child Pornography Sentencing Is Too Severe
The challenging nature of federal crimes investigations and prosecutions is well known among criminal defense attorneys. People who are accused of crimes involving child pornography, drugs or white collar issues that are subject to federal charges must understand that prosecutors have vast resources backed by stiff sentences and penalties.
Sex crimes legal experts are anticipating an upcoming report from the U.S. Sentencing Commission regarding harsh sentencing of child pornography offenders. Defense attorneys and many federal judges have long argued that punishment for child porn possession or distribution has grown far out of proportion to other crimes.
Based on a formal review dating to 2009, the commission is scheduled to deliver its report on sentencing of child pornography offenders by the end of this year. Many reasons illustrate why the report is likely to propose changes to the sentencing guidelines:
- The average sentence for a federal conviction for a child pornography crime in 2010 was exceeded only by murder and kidnapping, and was even higher than sentences for acts of sexual abuse
- This is true even though federal judges actually departed downward from the sentencing guidelines in 45 percent of cases in 2010
- In a commission survey, 70 percent of federal judges said that sentences proposed by federal guidelines were excessive
Underscoring these trends, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers recently published an article from former Sen. Arlen Specter and former federal prosecutor Linda Dale Hoffa. They accuse Congress of losing sight of the point of criminal justice “in the rush to prove itself hostile to individuals who possess or distribute child pornography.”
In Michigan, the percentage of federal child pornography convictions as opposed to drug trafficking, fraud and other federal offenses is almost double the national average. Whether or not political will exists to amend sentencing guidelines, people accused after an Internet sting operation or under other circumstances have a great deal at stake.
What Our Clients Say
“I would recommend Mr. Freeman’s legal services to anyone! He is the perfect combination you want for your attorney, aggressive (when need be), timely, will listen to his client, and very persistent!” – Anonymous 2/11
“I would like to pass along some good news, I found out today that I will keep my job… There’s no doubt in my mind your hard work helped make that possible. Thanks for all you do and continue to fight the good fight.” – N.E. 6/19/18
“I went in for sentencing, and was given 2 years probation with no jail time. Mr. Freeman saved my life, and kept me a free man. I strongly suggest you call him, it will be the most important phone call you can make…” – Anonymous 2/11
“Mr. Freeman sets a bar that all other lawyers should aspire to. He is an expert in the field of law and his execution of client care exemplifies that. – Chris C. 9/10
“One of the things I appreciated the most about Mr. Freeman’s services is that he was honest telling what could and could not happen. He did an A1 job.” – F.T. 9/6/17