Law Office of John Freeman
Call for a free consultation 866-720-3708

Police & You: Is Your Smart Phone Data Protected?

Expect new developments this year regarding the Police & You.  On Friday, January 17, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases regarding the authority of police to search the contents of an individual's cell phone without a warrant. The Court has agreed to review Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie. Both cases involve information found in the defendant's cell phone that was used as evidence to convict.

Wurie involves call logs taken from a piece of technology that is rapidly becoming considered old-fashioned: Wurie's flip-phone.

In 2007, after watching Brian Wurie make a drug sale, a police officer followed Wurie from the scene and arrested him. Wurie was taken to the police station and searched, and officers checked the call logs of the two cell phones the defendant carried on him. They traced one number to Wurie's home, where a search uncovered a firearm and more drugs, resulting in additional charges.  The lower court ruled that the police were required to have a warrant before searching the phone.

Riley v. California involves a smartphone.  Riley was convicted of shooting at an occupied vehicle, attempted murder, and assault with a semi-automatic weapon for events in August 2009. Riley was not arrested at the scene of the incident, but later, when he was pulled over for driving with expired license plates. The police seized his cellphone from his person and examined its contents. Evidence taken from the phone and used to convict included a photo of Riley with a car that was seen at the shooting, and videos linking Riley to gang activity.

These cases have raised a significant question in the context of the Police & You -- whether it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment - which protects against unreasonable search and seizure - to allow police to search the mass of digitized information stored in an individual's cell phone at the time of their arrest without a search warrant.

Until now, cell phone searches have been protected under Chimel v. California. However, Chimel was decided in 1969, and does not account for the vast advancements in technology that have been made since then. The Supreme Court's review Riley and Wurie will examine how to apply an older court precedent to new devices. The Court's decision is expected by late-June, 2014.

Pending the outcome in Riley and Wuire, it is important to remember that law enforcement officials are able to search your phone and use its contents against you. Should you find yourself in this situation, the best option for you is to contact an experienced Michigan criminal defense attorney who will aggressively fight for you rights.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

For an initial consultation at the Law Office of John Freeman, call 866-720-3708 toll free or send us an email. In an emergency, call 248-918-0790 at any time of day or night.

From offices in Troy, Michigan, we represent clients in all federal and state courts in the greater Detroit area, throughout all of Michigan, and the United States.

Contact us today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Law Office of John Freeman

3150 Livernois Road
Suite 270
Troy, MI 48083

Toll Free: 866-720-3708
Phone: 248-918-0790
Phone: 313-330-2653
Fax: 248-250-5857
Troy Law Office Map

866-720-3708 - Toll Free
313-330-2653 - Emergency 24/7
248-250-5857 - Fax