Law Office of John Freeman
Call for a free consultation 866-720-3708

The Justice System: Federal Sentencing and Mandatory Minimums

In the Justice System, sentencing, and mandatory minimums for federal offenders are hot topics again.  In March, 2013 Democratic Senator Patrick J. Leahy and Republican Senator Rand Paul introduced the Safety Valve Act of 2013. If the bill becomes law, it will allow federal judges to sentence offenders facing mandatory minimum sentences to less time in prison, regardless of the crime charged, provided that doing so does not jeopardize public safety. This does not mean that federal judges will be required to sentence offenders below the mandatory minimum, it merely permits judges to do so when the mandatory minimum sentence is unreasonable and does not fulfill the legislature's goals of punishment.

Currently, federal prosecutors often charge mandatory minimum offenses to ensure a defendant receives a particular sentence that a particular judge cannot undercut. Prosecutors do this out of fear that the court will impose a sentence the prosecutor thinks is too lenient. Typical cases in the Justice System where prosecutors do this are firearms and child pornography offenses.

To determine whether a mandatory minimum sentence satisfies legislative goals of punishment, judges must consider the federal sentencing guidelines as well as a variety of factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), which include: the nature and circumstance of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant. The court must also consider the need for the sentence imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment; to afford adequate deterrence for criminal behavior; to protect the public; and to provide the accused with educational and vocational training, medical care, or other treatment. The court must also consider the kinds of sentences available, the sentencing ranges that have been established for the offense, pertinent policies, the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among similarly situated defendants, and the need to provide restitution to any victims

Sentencing in federal cases is a complex process. Effective sentencing advocacy for a guilty client by an experienced criminal defense attorney can make a difference in the number of months or even years someone charged with a federal crime may face. Often people assume an attorney can only help with the guilt/innocence phase of a case. However, sentencing advocacy is vital and begins on the first day of legal representation.

Therefore, if you or a loved one have been charged with a federal criminal offense, it is important that you contact an experienced Michigan federal defense attorney as quickly as possible.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

For an initial consultation at the Law Office of John Freeman, call 866-720-3708 toll free or send us an email. In an emergency, call 248-918-0790 at any time of day or night.

From offices in Troy, Michigan, we represent clients in all federal and state courts in the greater Detroit area, throughout all of Michigan, and the United States.

Contact us today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Law Office of John Freeman

3150 Livernois Road
Suite 270
Troy, MI 48083

Toll Free: 866-720-3708
Phone: 248-918-0790
Phone: 313-330-2653
Fax: 248-250-5857
Troy Law Office Map

866-720-3708 - Toll Free
313-330-2653 - Emergency 24/7
248-250-5857 - Fax